<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>accidental feminist &#187; maxim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accidentalfeminist.com/tag/maxim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accidentalfeminist.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:49:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>more like &#8220;publicity stunt 100&#8243;. yeah, I said it!</title>
		<link>http://accidentalfeminist.com/2009/06/24/more-like-publicity-stunt-100-yeah-i-said-it/</link>
		<comments>http://accidentalfeminist.com/2009/06/24/more-like-publicity-stunt-100-yeah-i-said-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[the thoughtful spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olivia munn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Leia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accidentalfeminist.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look, Maxim, far be it from ME to claim to be better at creating a misogynistic and opportunistic list of hot women based solely on an algorithm that looks something like: (actual attractiveness) x (projected gross of upcoming movie) + (how much their publicist paid you), but when will Olivia Munn get her rightful place [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, Maxim, far be it from ME to claim to be better at creating a misogynistic and opportunistic list of hot women based solely on an algorithm that looks something like: (actual attractiveness) x (projected gross of upcoming movie) + (how much their publicist paid you), but when will <a href="http://www.maxim.com/girls/hot-100/79081/2009-hot-100-100-91.html#5">Olivia Munn</a> get her rightful place next to <a href="http://www.maxim.com/girls/hot-100/79081/2009-hot-100-100-91.html#99">Megan Fox</a>? I mean, kudos for at least putting her on the list and all&#8230;throwin&#8217; the nerds a bone or something, but really, 96? That&#8217;s like, where <a href="http://www.maxim.com/girls/hot-100/79081/2009-hot-100-100-91.html#80">Drunkface</a> should be! Yeah, <a href="http://gofugyourself.celebuzz.com/go_fug_yourself/drunkface_mccord/">Drunkface</a>!</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t a girl who&#8217;s willing to do <a href="http://www.thebbps.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/olivia-munn-leia-02.jpg">this</a> get cozy with a girl who does <a href="http://blogs.nypost.com/popwrap/photos/Megan-Fox-naked-GQ%201.jpg">this</a>?</p>
<p>What? What to do you MEAN irony isn&#8217;t sexy?! Aren&#8217;t you magazine editors the ones who have been putting female comedians on your covers all Spring claiming that &#8220;funny is the new sexy&#8221;? </p>
<p>Whatever! I give up! Just enjoy <a href="http://www.break.com/index/really-funny-teleprompter-blooper.html">this</a>, people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://accidentalfeminist.com/2009/06/24/more-like-publicity-stunt-100-yeah-i-said-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
